Hypnosis for distress around medical procedures (Tefikow 2013)
A meta-analysis of 34 randomized trials (n = 2,597) found moderate effects on distress (Hedges' g = 0.53) and pain (g = 0.44). For general, everyday stress the evidence is markedly weaker and equivocal.
The question: Do hypnosis and guided imagery reduce distress and pain in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures?
| Type of study | Meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| Who took part | 2,597 adults across 34 randomized trials |
| How much weight it carries | Mixed evidence |
What it found
- Across 34 randomized trials (n = 2,597), hypnosis reduced distress (Hedges' g = 0.53) and pain (g = 0.44) in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures.
- A separate 2025 analysis (Lahoud and colleagues) of 142 studies and 9,238 patients found pre-operative anxiety reduced by SMD −0.76, with moderate certainty.
- Brain-imaging work reports a genuine, if inconsistent, neural signature of hypnosis.
- For general, everyday stress the evidence is markedly weaker; Fisch et al. (2017) concluded effectiveness "remains unclear".
Limits
- The interventions cannot be blinded, so the placebo component is hard to isolate.
- Trial pools are small, heterogeneity is high and publication bias is under-assessed.
- Hypnotizability varies widely between people.
Where this sits
More in the library on anxiety and stress. For the wider picture, read Binaural beats for anxiety.
This is our plain-language reading of the paper. It is not medical advice, and one study rarely settles a question.
Sources
- Tefikow, S., et al. (2013). Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(5), 623–636. ; Lahoud, Gurary, & Elia (2025). Anaesthesia, 81(1), 103–115. ; Landry, Lifshitz, & Raz (2017). Brain correlates of hypnosis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 81, 75–98. ; Jiang, … Spiegel (2017). Cerebral Cortex, 27(8), 4083–4093. ; Fisch et al. (2017). BMC CAM 17:323. doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.005